It’s not fish wrap that’s at stake–it’s our freedom

I’m worried about our world when all we have left for news is chewed-over sound bites from a bunch of talking heads. Who’s going to pay for the real reporting we desperately need?

May 27th, 2009 | by Coco McCabe

An old friend from my newspapering days came for supper the other night. Inevitably, the talk turned to the demise of the ink-on-paper news industry and what its collapse is going to mean for all of us. Trouble, I think—the kind we can hardly fathom here in the US where our right to be informed feels like part of our genetic code.

I’ve been thinking a lot about that right—and the healthy habits of questioning and challenging that it feeds—since Oxfam colleagues from Africa, South America, and Central America arrived in Boston last week for a communications workshop. Part of the workshop focused on pitching stories to the media—a delicate undertaking in countries where governments would just as soon have the public remain in the dark and there is no such thing as a free press. There are some things you just can’t say publicly, said one of my African counterparts, no matter how truthful it is.

Our government here may be no fonder than any other of having its unfair practices and embarrassing peccadilloes widely broadcast. But as citizens of the US, we have been raised to believe those truths belong to us. It’s our right to hear about them—and to act on them. And that’s where the trouble newspapers are facing comes in. They are often the ones that sniff out those injustices and pay for the leg work to expose them. But investigative journalism, which helps to keep government, businesses, and civic institutions honest, is expensive. If newspapers can no longer afford to operate, who’s going to do the digging to keep us informed? What’s their shuttering going to mean for the freedoms we take for granted here?

On my last trip to Africa in January, at the time of Obama’s inauguration, there was elation in the air and a crazy hunger among people in one capital city to compare all that our new president stood for with all that their leader did not. But that longing was muzzled—heard only in whispers between hosts and their foreign visitors. Few would dare criticize in a headline a head of state known to stomp hard and fast on dissenters. Speaking the truth was dangerous, as it is in so many countries in the world, and the fear was palpable.

But if we lose the habit here—and the willingness to invest in it—we may soon find ourselves in the same position as too much of the world: shackled by ignorance and the erosion of rights that follow.

Comments

2 Responses to “It’s not fish wrap that’s at stake–it’s our freedom”

  1. Coco,
    I understand the concern about journalism’s role in a healthy democracy but I would like to think that actually what may emerge shortly will be healthier than the current state of journalism. Take a look at the mainstream press’s lack of serious questioning prior to the Iraq war and you know that the problems with newspapers go far deeper than dropping circulation numbers.
    Some experts see a non-profit model emerging so newspapers can do their jobs and not just be part of a corporate balance sheet. Until then, bloggers can play the role that pamphleteers did in Colonial times; sometimes rabid but provocative.

  2. David:

    It’s not only the large dailies I’m worried about–it’s all the small community newspapers that are essential to ensuring our towns are run well. Without those weekly newspapers, it’s hard to know what’s going on behind the town hall doors. My town stilI has a weekly, but its reporting staff has been decimated and there’s very little news left beyond coverage of high school sports–an absence I felt keenly last night at our spring town meeting. We were voting on a question that had to do with a multi-million-dollar land trust, set up centuries ago, that is supposed to benefit the public schools. Coverage of the issue has been spotty at best, and I have little faith that there will be much thoughtful reporting on all that was said at the meeting last night–things that voters who couldn’t make it to the session need to know. How do we keep these small–and absolutely vital–papers afloat?

Join the discussion